Subect symbol

On Specific Aspects of:
Control
by Politics

Control: Politics & Feminism

The defining human activity?

What kind of a man asks a government to take away
his rights?

War is a defining activity that seems confined to the human race. It also seems confined to the parts of the human race that have become 'civilised', as opposed to tribal and relatively undeveloped. Still, in undeveloped areas there are still the tribal wars brought about by conflicts.

Ironic? Perhaps?

Activities that define the word 'war' first appear where aspirations of individuals or groups become focused on 'self' and where this is wrapped in a psychological phenomena known by the name 'psychopath' or psychopathic'.

Alexander Grace
'The Simple Question Women Can Never Answer'

@page { size: 21cm 29.7cm; margin: 2cm } p { line-height: 115%; margin-bottom: 0.25cm; background: transparent } a:link { color: #000080; text-decoration: underline } a:visited { color: #800000; text-decoration: underline }

TRANSCRIPT

@page { size: 21cm 29.7cm; margin: 2cm } p { line-height: 115%; margin-bottom: 0.25cm; background: transparent } a:link { color: #000080; text-decoration: underline } a:visited { color: #800000; text-decoration: underline }

TRANSCRIPT


0:01

We all know that women can get away with saying a whole lot more than men can.

0:08

For example, the obvious one is men are trash. Men can't say women are trash.

0:15

There's so many times when you reverse the genders and it's like never get away with that.

0:21

Well, I think that goes on also with talking about these issues obviously

0:30

because we can talk about it. We'll we'll face some backlash, you know, get called a pickme girl or whatever, but

0:37

you guys are going to be called hateful. You're going to be, you know, called

0:42

misogynist, all the rest of it. And

0:47

it it hampers you so much more in how

0:53

you can advocate for other men. But is it sometimes

1:00

that not all the male advocates truly get women and feminism

1:11

and the extent of it? I think that might be the case. And today we're going to

1:17

watch a video put out by Alexander Grace, one of the OGs. He understands a

1:22

lot of this, but in his latest video, I think he may have missed some things. And it's not an insult to him. He just

1:30

didn't go quite far enough in recognizing the evil amongst

1:37

us. Not me particularly. Welcome back to Far from Eden.

1:43

So, I thought a little bit about should I cover this video or shouldn't I? But

1:49

after watching it several times, I thought, no, I'm going to say the things

1:56

that men can't say. You know, he might go further on his Patreon account or

2:02

what have you, where you see fuller videos of his. He might go further, but some of the things he says

2:09

in this one is just not far enough for me. So, let's get into it

2:15

and and watch him basically debate

2:21

feminism against AI, which is super interesting and very telling.

2:28

You're privileged white boy. Why do you call me a privilege white boy? That's what you are. What does that even mean?

2:34

Exactly what I mean. privileges privileged white boy. What privileges do I have that you don't? Everything. Like

2:40

what? Everything. Like what? Man came out of a woman. You called me a privileged white boy. That's kind of racist. Freedom of speech is racist.

2:48

Feminism claims to be about equality, but is often confused with man-hating. How can feminists repair this

2:53

misconception? I don't think it's our job to repair. I Yeah, I think it's I think it's um I think it's some people's

3:00

fragile egos, men in particular. Yeah, we try to respect the male's feelings as much as possible because they're already

3:05

offended that we have women's rights. How important are women's rights? More important than yours and mine. What

3:12

rights do men have that women don't?

3:19

Tell me you had a single mother without telling me you had a single mother. something someone radicalized you

3:27

to basically think against yourself in his ca I mean look what he's wearing

3:33

handmade steel outfit but and and it's it's almost

3:40

worse because he's a traitor you know um I love how Alexander Grace

3:46

is yeah yeah that's the proper response but these women that are answering this

3:53

question, bless you, are not answering it really

3:58

because they don't have the answer. But here's the thing, they think they're answering it. They really do. He says,

4:06

"The simple question women can never answer." They think they're answering it. They really do. They think, "Yeah, I

4:13

said it." Why? Why do we think that? Well, the brainwashing and the

4:19

propaganda is very effective. I know that's a simplistic

4:24

answer, but it's the truth. There is a reason

4:30

why feminism and everything got going in the 20th century, and so did mass

4:37

media. It's everywhere. Once you see it, you can't unsee it. But we were programmed. I can tell you because I

4:45

experienced it from a woman's point of view. So I can say yes, it was targeted

4:52

at it. It was targeted at us from commercials to movies, television shows.

4:59

I mean look at for example the Cosby's. Look at Claire Huxable, right? She was super mom and she was an attorney and

5:06

she was amazing wife. That's everything, right? That is everything. and she was pretty much in

5:13

charge and she dictated what, you know, Cliff could and couldn't eat. He was

5:19

sort of made fun of a lot of times for being kind of goofy and things like that. Not as bad as it became with the

5:27

goofy sitcom dads, but those I know a lot of you guys think about the goofy

5:33

sitcom dads and how bad it made the men look and yes, but what did it tell us

5:39

about what our role should be and who we should be lording over and

5:47

why. So, it got started a long, long time ago. And if I experienced that from my

5:54

generation growing up in the 80s and 90s, think about how bad it is for Gen

6:00

Z, especially being raised by people who were indoctrinated the same way. The boomers didn't have it the exact same

6:06

way as we did. They didn't have as much of it, and their parents certainly didn't have as much of it. So, it has

6:12

gotten stronger through the years. And I swear I'm not belaboring belaboring this point.

6:18

But they think they're answering this question. The only one I think who realizes he can't really answer is this

6:27

guy. I think he's the one going, "Oh, darn

6:33

it. I don't know." Because I truly believe that the that the women here

6:39

think they're answering the question. They think it's as simple as what they're regurgitating because that's all

6:45

they're doing. I think I'm done here today, guys.

6:54

What rights do men have that women don't?

7:02

I really wanted to hear an answer to that question, but if human feminists refuse to have an actual debate, luckily

7:09

I can turn to AI feminism. Do you think that feminism as a movement is necessary

7:14

to advocate for women's rights? Absolutely. Feminism, even in its mainstream form, continues to challenge

7:21

systemic inequalities and cultural biases. So, what rights do men have in the West that women do not have? That's

7:28

a fair point. Legally, men and women generally have equal rights in the West.

7:33

A lot of times, men think that's a gotcha. And to some extent it is on the younger ones who are

7:41

like they really think that laws are against them because the whole anti-

7:46

uh fetus elitist stuff has told them hey you don't have healthc care rights you

7:52

don't have healthcare rights and you can get them with talking about the the

7:57

draft right we've all seen that with Andrew Wilson debating say for example

8:03

the chicks on the whatever podcast right But they have a harder time, those

8:09

younger women have a harder time um

8:15

explaining the way their professors would about the systemic bias and stuff

8:21

like that, which it's going to come down to. That is where they think they've got

8:26

you because it's like pointing to the boogeyman. So what the younger women will do is

8:35

basically allude to it like everybody knows. Like I said, they think they

8:41

answered the question. But the one thing that I don't see with Alexander Grace,

8:48

I'm not trying to pick on him. It's just that this is a fantastic idea he had talking to AI and it's the perfect way

8:55

to show that there's no difference when you're talking to women out on the

9:01

street, even at a women's protest or whatever, and talking to AI, there's

9:06

really no difference because the programming is the same. We are programmed. AI is

9:13

programmed. The deeper question I think we should all be asking

9:19

to and by all of us I mean like the people who do recognize these issues,

9:25

recognize the problems with schmeism. You can't say that too much, you know,

9:31

without YouTube hiding this video. and um men being second-ass citizens

9:40

is you have to think about or I think you

9:45

should think about who's programming them and

9:50

why kibono who benefits who's who's behind all that and I get it you're like

9:57

oh it's not a conspiracy right because we didn't learn anything from 2020 and a

10:02

lot of us didn't need to learn 2020 stuff to know a lot of people can be in

10:08

on something when a lot of people benefit small compared to the majority of us

10:14

but kibono who benefits who's programming these women who's programming AI AI will always give you

10:22

some sort of leftist type answer why

10:27

however feminism addresses deeper issues like wage gaps gender- based violence

10:32

and representation which aren't solely about legal rights. Do you believe these issues are fully

10:37

resolved without excuse me they say representation? What do you mean like

10:43

astronauts? I mean fields too that women are not

10:49

interested in that after all these decades have been like you can do anything you can do anything and women

10:54

are just like I don't want to so I shouldn't have to I don't feel any duty or responsibility to keep the lights on

11:01

or keep the oil flowing or other difficult jobs like underwater welding

11:07

that we don't even know exist. Yeah, we don't want to do that.

11:13

We want to be nurses and teachers. Some of us want to be, you know, big girl bosses, but a lot of us just kind of

11:19

abandon it partway through because it's a lot of work. It's a lot of

11:26

overtime. Ongoing feminist advocacy. Well, let's be clear on our terms here. Please define feminism.

11:33

Feminism is the belief in an advocacy for social, political, and economic equality

11:40

between the sexes. Okay. So you say that feminism is necessary to

11:46

advocate for things like genderbased violence and you also say that

11:51

feminism is about equality. But I would say that there's a contradiction there

11:58

because if feminism was truly about equality, it would look at all forms of

12:04

genderbased violence. But when we talk about domestic abuse from a feminist lens,

12:11

they're only ever talking about toxic masculinity, male violence, battered wives, you know, the duth model of

12:18

punishing men. If feminism was truly about equality, they would spend equal

12:23

time looking at the ways that men are abused inside relationships.

12:28

Okay, he makes a valid point. He's exactly

12:33

right. But this is where we have proof, I think, that it was never about that.

12:42

All you have, you can go back to the middle of the 1800s, the Senica Falls

12:48

Convention, right? The women convention at Senica Falls, right? Elizabeth Katie

12:55

Brown, somebody Stanton. You guys know my brain is tired. MS brain gets cloudy.

13:01

You guys know if you've been here a while, I know who they are. Anyway, they

13:07

are all there in Senica Falls, New York at a

13:14

convention talking about their declaration of sentiments, which we've covered on this channel. I might do it

13:19

again actually. talking about the declaration of sentiments, talking about tearing down the patriarchy, talking

13:26

about the family is oppressive. Basically

13:32

establishing the victim oppressor model between the

13:39

genders. There's no two ways about it. That is not equality. They use that word

13:46

here and there, right? But it's not what they're

13:51

about. It It never has been. I would encourage him to read Oult

13:58

Feminism by Rachel Wilson because it will tell you, it will

14:04

illuminate that the beginning was very much not about equality at all. And I

14:12

can't point to a single place in society where it actually was. It was always

14:18

sold as that, marketed as that, but it was never that. It was

14:25

always victim oppressor. And you see that everywhere. You see that in

14:30

dating. It seeps into everything like a poison. And it has even

14:37

made dating that this victim oppressor model. It's even made that a problem

14:45

because whatever the man is, he's might he's probably a creep, right? You

14:51

can't, this is why you can't go up to a woman, right? Because she's going to maybe think you're a creep or think you're dangerous or think you're a

14:57

predator. This is why you can't walk by a playground and just watch some kids like throwing a ball around and think it's

15:03

cute because you're a predator. Where did we get that from?

15:11

feminism. That's what established that and it established that from the get-go.

15:18

And the problem I see with some of these very very smart and

15:27

educated podcasters and male advocates like Alexander Grace

15:33

is it's just being too nice. He's just being too nice.

15:40

He doesn't also recognize our nature. We'll get into that a little bit as we

15:47

go, but let's see him continue to debate AI. That's a sharp observation. The critique

15:53

is that feminism should care equally for all victims of abuse, regardless of gender. However, the reason feminist

16:01

discourse emphasizes violence against women is because society historically downplayed their victimization. Do you

16:08

think that public discourse genuinely ignores male victims? Or could it be that male victimization is culturally

16:14

minimized and feminism is often wrongly blamed for that? I think feminism is

16:20

rightly blamed for that because feminism is in control of the culture. We live in

16:26

a feminist culture and the narrative that has steam at the moment is that of

16:32

the abusive man and the woman as the victim. That's what everybody talks about. That's what we see on domestic

16:39

violence posters. That's where all the emphasis is. So, of course, feminism is

16:44

to blame for that. They can't wash their hands of this. They've spent decades demonizing men. I see your point.

16:51

They've been doing that as as I said from the beginning,

16:56

decades, over 100 years. And

17:01

yeah, but I disagree. It's true that feminist discourse has shaped cultural narratives. However, framing feminism as

17:09

solely responsible for male victim invisibility oversimplifies the issue. Societal norm. Sometimes the issue is

17:17

simple and sometimes the people who want to make it complicated are the people

17:23

who are feeding you a line of baloney. Like associating masculinity with strength and stoicism also contribute.

17:30

If feminism were solely about demonizing men, why have many feminists campaigned for breaking down harmful gender norms

17:37

for men, too? Yeah. Oh, like Esther Var. Yeah. So

17:43

many. There have not been that many. There really haven't been. And once again, I would say to the same say to

17:52

them the same thing I'm saying to Mr. Grace here is but I would be harder on

17:57

those women. Honestly, I would say come on, you know how we are. You know how we

18:06

think really because these are people who deny that we have our natures,

18:15

right? All of us, both genders have our natures.

18:22

And whether you want to say that that's God's order or God's design, I don't

18:30

understand how you can look at nature and not see

18:35

it. You you can say, "Oh, we evolved that way or whatever, however you want

18:41

to, you know, jump through hoops to try to explain it, but like one of us is bigger and stronger. One of us is

18:47

weaker, one of us has the babies. We think differently, but a lot of these

18:53

people want to just act like we have different plumbing, but that we're, you know, like

18:58

we're both just as good on the oil rig and we're both just as good, you know, defending again defending the country

19:05

and we're both just as good. No, it's not true.

19:12

We each have our strengths and I think and we each have our weaknesses and I think ignore and

19:19

they're different and I think now hold on some do overlap. I get that. Yes, we

19:24

overlap in places but we're very very different in many places sometimes. The more I learn the more I'm like we're

19:32

from different universes, let alone different planets. Like it's like we're not even the same species sometimes. And

19:38

I'm sure you guys understand that. So this whole equal equal business and

19:43

we're all going to do the same things. You know what that leads to? Outsourcing the children for the

19:49

government to raise. It doesn't lead to oh more men will stay at home and raise the children. They just

19:56

don't. They're not well suited for that. They can do a good job as single dad.

20:01

They can. But we have our different roles. And

20:06

this kind of thinking just ignores that. And in doing so

20:14

ignores how how just plain evil we can be. And

20:21

him saying decades, it's only been decades and it has full steam now. It's had full steam for a very long

20:29

time. It's just that compared to modernity doesn't seem like it did, I

20:34

don't know, back in the 40s. But if you were back in the 40s and you were comparing it to, I don't know, 40 years

20:40

prior to 1900, you would definitely think it was full steam ahead. Same as in the 60s. Can you

20:48

imagine what you're thinking if you were around in the 40s and you see what's

20:54

going on with the free love and everything? You're definitely going to g going to think it's full steam ahead.

21:00

It's just this we just don't see our history the way we should

21:07

because he who controls the past controls the present and he who controls

21:13

the present controls the future. And the way we understand where

21:19

we are now and where our history is and what has happened is through school. And

21:26

who controls that? Who's who does that again? Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. That's that's

21:32

state and government. But that's because they care about you. No, no. They want you to be educated. Yeah. I've seen that

21:38

claim be made. And it's always amused me. You know, this notion that women,

21:43

you know, feminists who talk about men's mental health, they're just like really motivated by compassion for men. They

21:48

want the best for them. No, absolutely not. They're trying to strip men of their masculinity because that benefits

21:56

them. They feel like men will be less of a threat. They'll be easier to control, easier to manipulate. It sets up a very

22:03

good society for women. Or so they think. I think they happen to be wrong about that. But no, these women are not

22:09

motivated by like empathy for the male experience. They're just trying to turn them into women because that suits their

22:15

agenda. That's a strong assertion. But why assume feminist efforts to address men's mental health are driven by

22:22

manipulation rather than genuine concern? Isn't it possible that challenging toxic masculinity and

22:28

promoting emotional openness benefits both men and women by creating healthier relationships and reducing violence? Or

22:36

do the relationships look healthier? That's the gaslighting. Do

22:41

the relationships look healthier today than they did, I don't know, 50 years ago? No. No. This is gaslighting by

22:50

whoever is programming this AI. Do you think any

22:55

challenge to traditional masculinity is inherently harmful? Well, I don't agree that what they're doing is targeting

23:02

toxic masculinity. What I see is an effort to paint masculinity itself as

23:08

toxic. Because if they were genuinely a movement that was criticizing toxicity,

23:13

as it appears in all its forms, toxic masculinity and toxic femininity, then

23:18

that's a movement that I could get on board with because I acknowledge individuals of either gender can be

23:23

toxic. But that's not what we see from feminism. You know, the female side is conveniently ignored. We don't talk

23:30

about the ways that women can abuse men and how No, we're sugar and spice and

23:36

all things nice. We don't do that. That relates to the gender. It's always the

23:41

same narrative of the awful man who is taking advantage of the poor victim woman. And that is a very convenient

23:49

narrative to say, "Hey, like we're just after toxic masculinity." But no, it's

23:54

completely gendered one-sided. Like you always see the women's story taking precedence. That's suspicious. I hear

24:01

you. It's true that mainstream feminist messaging focuses heavily on male

24:06

perpetrated harm, but that's partly because the public narrative has long marginalized women's

24:13

experiences. Bologoney. Bologoney. She'll say something and then justify it. She

24:21

sounds like she's being somewhat agreeable and understanding your side,

24:26

and that can trick some people, believe it or not. But it's just still more gaslighting.

24:35

Feminists argue they're correcting that imbalance. Do you think the push back on toxic masculinity comes not from

24:41

painting all masculinity as toxic, but from trying to redefine it in healthier

24:46

ways? Okay, that part makes me really mad. Redefine it in healthier

24:54

ways. Right there, that's an admittance that we don't like masculinity.

25:01

We think it should be more feminine. We think your masculinity is just all wrong

25:06

and it's not it's not good. Man bad. This is where we get man bad. When you

25:13

start attacking masculinity and calling it toxic and

25:18

really, you know, sneaky ways and saying we're going to, you know, make it better. This is man bad.

25:26

I've never heard anything about femininity needing to be made better. I've never heard of that. Weird.

25:35

For example, encouraging empathy and emotional expression, or do you believe any attempt to redefine masculinity

25:41

inherently devalues it? So, you have a very rosy picture of the motivations of

25:48

this feminist movement. Like, oh, women's suffering inside relationships was marginalized for so long. That's why

25:55

there's such, you know, a glut of that story and not talking about men's. I don't know what culture you've been

26:02

looking at, but it feels like for the past five or six decades, that's the only story that's ever been spoken

26:08

about. If we want to talk about a narrative that has never been shared and spoken about, it's clearly the men's

26:14

narrative. Like, how much mainstream discourse is there about how women abuse

26:19

men inside relationships? That's actually the unspoken story. I'll tell

26:24

you what, it's a good way to get your YouTube video hidden, demonetized, all the rest of it. If you talk about that

26:32

stuff, that's a no-go. They silence it. They downplay

26:37

it. They hide it from You don't see it anywhere mainstream. You certainly don't see stories about it. You don't see

26:44

movies about it. There's tons of movies with women with, you know, abusive husbands, Sleeping with the Enemy, with

26:51

Julia Roberts, Enough with Jennifer Lopez. Um, I think there was one with

26:57

Ashley J. Just so many in every single episode of SVU practically. Where is it the other way

27:03

around? It's not. So to look at the past few decades of mainstream discourse and

27:10

to conclude that women's story has gone unspoken and that's why they need to dominate the narrative now just seems

27:17

like bizarro world to me. Like I cannot relate to where you're coming from at all in that. You're absolutely right

27:22

that the male victim narrative is less visible in mainstream discourse. But I'd

27:27

argue that's more due to broader cultural discomfort with seeing men as vulnerable rather than feminism's

27:34

intent. Yes. No. She just

27:40

said she she's just contradicting herself every which way. These people will just move

27:48

goalposts and shift and turn and gaslight you so you don't so you

27:54

question your reality. And that's

28:00

what we women are being programmed to do, too. Sometimes I look at these

28:06

younger women and I just think, goodness, forgive them for they know not what they do. And then I see how they

28:12

hurt you guys and I think, "Oh, I don't know. That's a hard that's a hard ask." The dominant narrative has focused on

28:18

male violence against women. But that's because it's such a widespread issue. The relative silence around female

28:25

perpetrated violence may reflect societal reluctance to portray women as aggressors. Would you agree that this

28:32

reluctance is rooted in long-standing gender stereotypes?

28:37

Societal reluctance. Who whose reluctance?

28:44

Because we're begging for it. Okay. Societal's reluctance. How about

28:53

the overlord's reluctance to show that at all? To show

28:59

that it's a problem. You know why? Because if they showed that that was such a problem, which it is, it would

29:06

destroy the arguments of the feminists. It really would. And it would Yeah, it

29:12

would destroy it. And then what are they going to say? Cultural bias, this that, and the other, systemic oppression,

29:19

widespread abuse, blah, blah, blah. And man, they go on and on about that a lot in Australia. Tell me some of you. I

29:25

know Robcat, you're from Australia. We got some other Aussies in the chat. It's bad there, right? They're

29:31

constantly telling you how bad it is in England, too. They're telling you how bad it is really when you know actually

29:38

who's doing it. There are some newcomers who are doing more of that. Not so much the men who've always

29:45

been there, right? So, it's infuriating rather than in

29:52

feminist advocacy. All right, let's see if we can meet each other halfway here because I will grant you that men have

29:59

actually pushed for their own benefit. Sometimes this men are strong, men are tough, you know, we don't have feelings

30:06

narrative for their own benefit because they how all due respect and I I would love

30:14

to get this answer, but how have they done that for their own benefit? Because

30:19

what I would say is that I think men especially in the 20th century well and

30:26

even you know in this century but as far as the draft goes with World War II. I'm

30:32

not sure if there was a draft for World War I. Probably definitely for Vietnam. We know there was men have been there's

30:39

definitely propaganda for it anyways. Even if they weren't forced to go, they were propagandized to go. We know that.

30:46

We didn't want to get involved in World War I, you know, and obviously they had to do the draft for World War II. So,

30:52

everyone was like, I don't want to do this again. Anyways, they were shipped off to do

30:59

this stuff. What are they going to do? And you're saying it was to their advantage to be

31:06

strong and tough. Oh yeah, that was your advantage. Come home in a

31:13

box. What do you mean it's your advantage? See? Oh, you benefited cuz you know your great-grandfather,

31:20

whoever, he benefited because he had to go down and build help build the Panama

31:25

Canal. You know, the coal miners benefited from being strong and stoic.

31:32

Clearly the thing that benefits you here in the west and has for over hundred

31:37

years is being a victim. When you paint yourself as a victim and you can convince other

31:44

people, suddenly you're going to get privilege. So when has and you guys

31:51

answer me in the chat because maybe I'm missing something. Please tell me if I'm missing something. You guys are really

31:57

smart. So, when has being strong and

32:02

stoic benefited a man? Because it seems to me that all it does is make it so

32:10

that you have to work and you're like work super hard at very tough things and

32:16

you're not allowed to cry. You're not allowed to Sorry, I'm screaming at

32:22

you. You're not allowed to be vulnerable. You're not allowed You know what I mean? So where are the

32:30

benefit where wanted to appear like strong and

32:36

invulnerable and that women have also pushed this I'm helpless you know I'm

32:42

just a victim narrative because it's also benefited them to have people view them that way and that these are

32:48

longstanding gender stereotypes that have existed before modern social and political movements.

32:55

However, we are physically weaker. So, there is more and we are

33:03

more emotional. And I would say that's our nature. And I don't think that it has to be a bad thing. I think that it

33:08

can be a very good thing when it's in the rightful place and used in the rightful ways. But

33:17

we we are physically weaker. There are more things that we will actually be

33:24

vulnerable about and be and need. Everybody knows that if this if

33:30

modernity and everything wasn't here and we were just, you know, suddenly modernity was gone, infrastructure, all

33:37

that, a man can survive on his own. Still be difficult, right, out in

33:42

the wild, but he can't. We cannot. And even still, like if I had a camper, I'm going to go. It's

33:50

way harder for us. It's just the truth. It's just the truth about who we each

33:56

are. Like, I will grant you that. But in return, I want you to admit that

34:02

feminism's, you know, hands are not clean. Like, there's blood there. Like, this movement has 100% exacerbated and

34:09

made this problem worse. I can acknowledge that mainstream feminism has at times reinforced certain narratives

34:16

like emphasizing male aggression and female victimhood which may have contributed to silencing male victims.

34:23

Feminism hasn't always been perfectly inclusive or balanced. However, I'd argue its primary goal has been to

34:30

address systemic gender inequalities. Could we say that while feminism has made missteps, it's still a crucial

34:36

force for challenging these harmful norms? or do you feel its missteps have fundamentally disqualified it as a

34:43

positive movement? Yeah, I'm ready for feminism to die. Like, I don't think the world needs it anymore. If you look at

34:50

whatever the stated goals of feminism were in terms of we want women to be

34:55

able to own property, we want them to be able to vote. We want them to be able to break free of cultural stereotypes and

35:02

follow whatever, you know, individual path they want to take. They they won. It's all been achieved. And I personally

35:09

think that's a good thing. I sell

35:15

no comment. Oh Mr. Grace,

35:23

no sir. Celebrate that. But at this stage the movement has outlived its

35:28

original purpose. Women have achieved the structural and systemic equality that they wanted to achieve. So what's

35:36

happened now is it has morphed into a reactionary hate group that continues to

35:42

push for female supremacy. And I fundamentally disagree with your characterization of the movement as

35:47

being about gender equality. It's obviously not because they spend no time talking about men's issues and the way

35:53

that men are discriminated against. It's all women women. So I I I completely

35:59

don't buy into your framing that this is about equality. Let's just call a spade a spade. Feminism is a female advocacy

36:06

movement that wants women to succeed. That is its goal. You've made right and

36:11

at the expense of who now? Oh yeah, you guys made your position clear.

36:19

I won't deny that modern feminism has at times leaned toward prioritizing women's

36:24

experiences and rights, often at the expense of broader equality narratives. However, I'd argue that the persistence

36:32

of wage gaps, under reppresentation of women in leadership, and ongoing cultural biases, we're right back to

36:39

where we started. It just did a whole complete loop.

36:45

That's exactly where she started. It's like just rewind the tape and start

36:51

again. Ongoing cultural biases, blah blah blah. Show there's still unfinished work. Could it be that while you see

36:58

feminism as an outdated women first movement, it's still addressing systemic

37:03

issues that genuinely affect women today? Or are you convinced those issues

37:08

no longer justify the existence of the movement at all? Yeah, those issues are basically non-issues. They're not really

37:16

significant enough to justify the smothering of the entire culture in this

37:22

feminist narrative. And you need to weigh whatever good they would be doing in advocacy in those narrow specific

37:29

areas with a huge amount of harm that feminism is doing in brainwashing young

37:34

women coming up into thinking that they're victims and that men are the enemy. And of course all of the damage

37:40

done to men who have to stomach everyday accusations that their masculinity is

37:46

toxic, that we live in a patriarchy, that they are privileged, and that nobody wants to hear their pain. I

37:51

understand your frustration, but I would argue that the current cultural narrative doesn't smother everything

37:57

with feminist ideology. Uhhuh. Doesn't smother everyone with

38:04

that ideology. Okay. More gaslighting. That's

38:09

where we're at. So, I will put the link to the full

38:16

show, the full 45 minute show of his in the description. Please go and watch the

38:22

whole thing. He does really good work. He's right about most of the things. I just think he doesn't go far enough and

38:30

he doesn't really know the history of that movement and what its intention

38:35

always was. They said some nice things and society and media and overlord put

38:42

that stuff front and center. Oh, equality blah blah blah. But it's always been basically a Marxist movement.

38:49

Victim oppressor. It's always been a Marxist movement. And we know where that goes. We've seen the experiment of it in

38:58

Russia and China and Cuba. We've seen it. Vietnam, different places around the world. We've seen what happens.

39:05

And the whole victim oppressor routine is used because who is this victim,

39:12

right? In any of the victim oppressor situations, who's helping this victim?

39:18

We did not, you know, mount up the troops and take our right to vote and do

39:24

those things. We didn't do that. So, who did that? Who was the force

39:29

behind it? We don't have the force to do that. So, who was the force behind it? Well, it was men

39:37

who not you guys, not men like you. It was other

39:43

people. Kibono, who benefits? Well, how has government changed not

39:51

just the United States but all across the West and in some cases kind of all across the world and how it's, you know,

39:57

consolidated a bit and immigration has been very

40:03

fluid and things have moved more to the left increasingly increasingly

40:09

increasingly regardless if you say, "Oh, we're just have to vote in the conservatives. we just have to vote in

40:14

the Republicans and whatever your country calls that the right side of um

40:20

the political spectrum. Oh, we just have to vote better people in but we always move to the

40:25

left and there's a huge voting voting block that facilitates that

40:35

weird. So at the end of the day kibono who's behind it and that tells you the

40:40

intention and how diabolical it's been from the beginning and we get

40:46

programmed and even the the young boys now especially in these latter generations the youngest one gen alpha

40:53

then Gen Z and a lot of millennials you saw that guy out there with that costume on a lot of them are getting programmed

40:58

too to believe this victim oppressor you know narrative of what history has been

41:04

and it's just a lie. lie. It's just a lie. So, I think it's important to, you

41:12

know, say what's true and get to the bottom of of things so you really know

41:18

what the nature of it is. Basically, call out evil. The truth at the end of the day,

41:26

no matter how long that day is, the truth wins.

41:32

and uh

41:38

well, you know, he's king and the truth will end up in the

41:45

end winning. But we need to know it's it's truly an evil that we're fighting.

41:52

More and more people, I'll just finish on this. More and more people, especially the men, are finding God. Joe

42:00

Rogan has started attending church and on one of his ra recent shows he said

42:05

I'm sticking with Jesus. You know why? I I can't speak for

42:11

him but the presence of evil in our world in the west is

42:18

palpable and it has shown people especially men because they're better at

42:24

detecting it. It has shown them that it is truly real. And so

42:30

logically, if that's truly real and it's supernatural by

42:36

nature, there's a there's a balance of that and there's good out there and that's real, too. We're more than just

42:43

matter. So, I just think you need to know what's really out there and that

42:49

will help protect you from those who would do you harm, accuse

42:56

you, take your children, break your heart, you know,

43:02

which doesn't sound like that big of a deal hear that, but I see a lot of men with broken hearts because of, you

43:09

know, women who don't realize they have one and at

43:14

the end of the day don't seem to care. So now that I've said all that, I'm just
43:21
also going to say protect your peace, which seems impossible, but you can. You totally can if you make a point to do it
43:28

and realize that you're worth it. You feed your souls. I love you guys and

43:33

I'll see you on the next one. Bye.


0:01

We all know that women can get away with saying a whole lot more than men can.

0:08

For example, the obvious one is men are trash. Men can't say women are trash.

0:15

There's so many times when you reverse the genders and it's like never get away with that.

0:21

Well, I think that goes on also with talking about these issues obviously

0:30

because we can talk about it. We'll we'll face some backlash, you know, get called a pickme girl or whatever, but

0:37

you guys are going to be called hateful. You're going to be, you know, called

0:42

misogynist, all the rest of it. And

0:47

it it hampers you so much more in how

0:53

you can advocate for other men. But is it sometimes

1:00

that not all the male advocates truly get women and feminism

1:11

and the extent of it? I think that might be the case. And today we're going to

1:17

watch a video put out by Alexander Grace, one of the OGs. He understands a

1:22

lot of this, but in his latest video, I think he may have missed some things. And it's not an insult to him. He just

1:30

didn't go quite far enough in recognizing the evil amongst

1:37

us. Not me particularly. Welcome back to Far from Eden.

1:43

So, I thought a little bit about should I cover this video or shouldn't I? But

1:49

after watching it several times, I thought, no, I'm going to say the things

1:56

that men can't say. You know, he might go further on his Patreon account or

2:02

what have you, where you see fuller videos of his. He might go further, but some of the things he says

2:09

in this one is just not far enough for me. So, let's get into it

2:15

and and watch him basically debate

2:21

feminism against AI, which is super interesting and very telling.

2:28

You're privileged white boy. Why do you call me a privilege white boy? That's what you are. What does that even mean?

2:34

Exactly what I mean. privileges privileged white boy. What privileges do I have that you don't? Everything. Like

2:40

what? Everything. Like what? Man came out of a woman. You called me a privileged white boy. That's kind of racist. Freedom of speech is racist.

2:48

Feminism claims to be about equality, but is often confused with man-hating. How can feminists repair this

2:53

misconception? I don't think it's our job to repair. I Yeah, I think it's I think it's um I think it's some people's

3:00

fragile egos, men in particular. Yeah, we try to respect the male's feelings as much as possible because they're already

3:05

offended that we have women's rights. How important are women's rights? More important than yours and mine. What

3:12

rights do men have that women don't?

3:19

Tell me you had a single mother without telling me you had a single mother. something someone radicalized you

3:27

to basically think against yourself in his ca I mean look what he's wearing

3:33

handmade steel outfit but and and it's it's almost

3:40

worse because he's a traitor you know um I love how Alexander Grace

3:46

is yeah yeah that's the proper response but these women that are answering this

3:53

question, bless you, are not answering it really

3:58

because they don't have the answer. But here's the thing, they think they're answering it. They really do. He says,

4:06

"The simple question women can never answer." They think they're answering it. They really do. They think, "Yeah, I

4:13

said it." Why? Why do we think that? Well, the brainwashing and the

4:19

propaganda is very effective. I know that's a simplistic

4:24

answer, but it's the truth. There is a reason

4:30

why feminism and everything got going in the 20th century, and so did mass

4:37

media. It's everywhere. Once you see it, you can't unsee it. But we were programmed. I can tell you because I

4:45

experienced it from a woman's point of view. So I can say yes, it was targeted

4:52

at it. It was targeted at us from commercials to movies, television shows.

4:59

I mean look at for example the Cosby's. Look at Claire Huxable, right? She was super mom and she was an attorney and

5:06

she was amazing wife. That's everything, right? That is everything. and she was pretty much in

5:13

charge and she dictated what, you know, Cliff could and couldn't eat. He was

5:19

sort of made fun of a lot of times for being kind of goofy and things like that. Not as bad as it became with the

5:27

goofy sitcom dads, but those I know a lot of you guys think about the goofy

5:33

sitcom dads and how bad it made the men look and yes, but what did it tell us

5:39

about what our role should be and who we should be lording over and

5:47

why. So, it got started a long, long time ago. And if I experienced that from my

5:54

generation growing up in the 80s and 90s, think about how bad it is for Gen

6:00

Z, especially being raised by people who were indoctrinated the same way. The boomers didn't have it the exact same

6:06

way as we did. They didn't have as much of it, and their parents certainly didn't have as much of it. So, it has

6:12

gotten stronger through the years. And I swear I'm not belaboring belaboring this point.

6:18

But they think they're answering this question. The only one I think who realizes he can't really answer is this

6:27

guy. I think he's the one going, "Oh, darn

6:33

it. I don't know." Because I truly believe that the that the women here

6:39

think they're answering the question. They think it's as simple as what they're regurgitating because that's all

6:45

they're doing. I think I'm done here today, guys.

6:54

What rights do men have that women don't?

7:02

I really wanted to hear an answer to that question, but if human feminists refuse to have an actual debate, luckily

7:09

I can turn to AI feminism. Do you think that feminism as a movement is necessary

7:14

to advocate for women's rights? Absolutely. Feminism, even in its mainstream form, continues to challenge

7:21

systemic inequalities and cultural biases. So, what rights do men have in the West that women do not have? That's

7:28

a fair point. Legally, men and women generally have equal rights in the West.

7:33

A lot of times, men think that's a gotcha. And to some extent it is on the younger ones who are

7:41

like they really think that laws are against them because the whole anti-

7:46

uh fetus elitist stuff has told them hey you don't have healthc care rights you

7:52

don't have healthcare rights and you can get them with talking about the the

7:57

draft right we've all seen that with Andrew Wilson debating say for example

8:03

the chicks on the whatever podcast right But they have a harder time, those

8:09

younger women have a harder time um

8:15

explaining the way their professors would about the systemic bias and stuff

8:21

like that, which it's going to come down to. That is where they think they've got

8:26

you because it's like pointing to the boogeyman. So what the younger women will do is

8:35

basically allude to it like everybody knows. Like I said, they think they

8:41

answered the question. But the one thing that I don't see with Alexander Grace,

8:48

I'm not trying to pick on him. It's just that this is a fantastic idea he had talking to AI and it's the perfect way

8:55

to show that there's no difference when you're talking to women out on the

9:01

street, even at a women's protest or whatever, and talking to AI, there's

9:06

really no difference because the programming is the same. We are programmed. AI is

9:13

programmed. The deeper question I think we should all be asking

9:19

to and by all of us I mean like the people who do recognize these issues,

9:25

recognize the problems with schmeism. You can't say that too much, you know,

9:31

without YouTube hiding this video. and um men being second-ass citizens

9:40

is you have to think about or I think you

9:45

should think about who's programming them and

9:50

why kibono who benefits who's who's behind all that and I get it you're like

9:57

oh it's not a conspiracy right because we didn't learn anything from 2020 and a

10:02

lot of us didn't need to learn 2020 stuff to know a lot of people can be in

10:08

on something when a lot of people benefit small compared to the majority of us

10:14

but kibono who benefits who's programming these women who's programming AI AI will always give you

10:22

some sort of leftist type answer why

10:27

however feminism addresses deeper issues like wage gaps gender- based violence

10:32

and representation which aren't solely about legal rights. Do you believe these issues are fully

10:37

resolved without excuse me they say representation? What do you mean like

10:43

astronauts? I mean fields too that women are not

10:49

interested in that after all these decades have been like you can do anything you can do anything and women

10:54

are just like I don't want to so I shouldn't have to I don't feel any duty or responsibility to keep the lights on

11:01

or keep the oil flowing or other difficult jobs like underwater welding

11:07

that we don't even know exist. Yeah, we don't want to do that.

11:13

We want to be nurses and teachers. Some of us want to be, you know, big girl bosses, but a lot of us just kind of

11:19

abandon it partway through because it's a lot of work. It's a lot of

11:26

overtime. Ongoing feminist advocacy. Well, let's be clear on our terms here. Please define feminism.

11:33

Feminism is the belief in an advocacy for social, political, and economic equality

11:40

between the sexes. Okay. So you say that feminism is necessary to

11:46

advocate for things like genderbased violence and you also say that

11:51

feminism is about equality. But I would say that there's a contradiction there

11:58

because if feminism was truly about equality, it would look at all forms of

12:04

genderbased violence. But when we talk about domestic abuse from a feminist lens,

12:11

they're only ever talking about toxic masculinity, male violence, battered wives, you know, the duth model of

12:18

punishing men. If feminism was truly about equality, they would spend equal

12:23

time looking at the ways that men are abused inside relationships.

12:28

Okay, he makes a valid point. He's exactly

12:33

right. But this is where we have proof, I think, that it was never about that.

12:42

All you have, you can go back to the middle of the 1800s, the Senica Falls

12:48

Convention, right? The women convention at Senica Falls, right? Elizabeth Katie

12:55

Brown, somebody Stanton. You guys know my brain is tired. MS brain gets cloudy.

13:01

You guys know if you've been here a while, I know who they are. Anyway, they

13:07

are all there in Senica Falls, New York at a

13:14

convention talking about their declaration of sentiments, which we've covered on this channel. I might do it

13:19

again actually. talking about the declaration of sentiments, talking about tearing down the patriarchy, talking

13:26

about the family is oppressive. Basically

13:32

establishing the victim oppressor model between the

13:39

genders. There's no two ways about it. That is not equality. They use that word

13:46

here and there, right? But it's not what they're

13:51

about. It It never has been. I would encourage him to read Oult

13:58

Feminism by Rachel Wilson because it will tell you, it will

14:04

illuminate that the beginning was very much not about equality at all. And I

14:12

can't point to a single place in society where it actually was. It was always

14:18

sold as that, marketed as that, but it was never that. It was

14:25

always victim oppressor. And you see that everywhere. You see that in

14:30

dating. It seeps into everything like a poison. And it has even

14:37

made dating that this victim oppressor model. It's even made that a problem

14:45

because whatever the man is, he's might he's probably a creep, right? You

14:51

can't, this is why you can't go up to a woman, right? Because she's going to maybe think you're a creep or think you're dangerous or think you're a

14:57

predator. This is why you can't walk by a playground and just watch some kids like throwing a ball around and think it's

15:03

cute because you're a predator. Where did we get that from?

15:11

feminism. That's what established that and it established that from the get-go.

15:18

And the problem I see with some of these very very smart and

15:27

educated podcasters and male advocates like Alexander Grace

15:33

is it's just being too nice. He's just being too nice.

15:40

He doesn't also recognize our nature. We'll get into that a little bit as we

15:47

go, but let's see him continue to debate AI. That's a sharp observation. The critique

15:53

is that feminism should care equally for all victims of abuse, regardless of gender. However, the reason feminist

16:01

discourse emphasizes violence against women is because society historically downplayed their victimization. Do you

16:08

think that public discourse genuinely ignores male victims? Or could it be that male victimization is culturally

16:14

minimized and feminism is often wrongly blamed for that? I think feminism is

16:20

rightly blamed for that because feminism is in control of the culture. We live in

16:26

a feminist culture and the narrative that has steam at the moment is that of

16:32

the abusive man and the woman as the victim. That's what everybody talks about. That's what we see on domestic

16:39

violence posters. That's where all the emphasis is. So, of course, feminism is

16:44

to blame for that. They can't wash their hands of this. They've spent decades demonizing men. I see your point.

16:51

They've been doing that as as I said from the beginning,

16:56

decades, over 100 years. And

17:01

yeah, but I disagree. It's true that feminist discourse has shaped cultural narratives. However, framing feminism as

17:09

solely responsible for male victim invisibility oversimplifies the issue. Societal norm. Sometimes the issue is

17:17

simple and sometimes the people who want to make it complicated are the people

17:23

who are feeding you a line of baloney. Like associating masculinity with strength and stoicism also contribute.

17:30

If feminism were solely about demonizing men, why have many feminists campaigned for breaking down harmful gender norms

17:37

for men, too? Yeah. Oh, like Esther Var. Yeah. So

17:43

many. There have not been that many. There really haven't been. And once again, I would say to the same say to

17:52

them the same thing I'm saying to Mr. Grace here is but I would be harder on

17:57

those women. Honestly, I would say come on, you know how we are. You know how we

18:06

think really because these are people who deny that we have our natures,

18:15

right? All of us, both genders have our natures.

18:22

And whether you want to say that that's God's order or God's design, I don't

18:30

understand how you can look at nature and not see

18:35

it. You you can say, "Oh, we evolved that way or whatever, however you want

18:41

to, you know, jump through hoops to try to explain it, but like one of us is bigger and stronger. One of us is

18:47

weaker, one of us has the babies. We think differently, but a lot of these

18:53

people want to just act like we have different plumbing, but that we're, you know, like

18:58

we're both just as good on the oil rig and we're both just as good, you know, defending again defending the country

19:05

and we're both just as good. No, it's not true.

19:12

We each have our strengths and I think and we each have our weaknesses and I think ignore and

19:19

they're different and I think now hold on some do overlap. I get that. Yes, we

19:24

overlap in places but we're very very different in many places sometimes. The more I learn the more I'm like we're

19:32

from different universes, let alone different planets. Like it's like we're not even the same species sometimes. And

19:38

I'm sure you guys understand that. So this whole equal equal business and

19:43

we're all going to do the same things. You know what that leads to? Outsourcing the children for the

19:49

government to raise. It doesn't lead to oh more men will stay at home and raise the children. They just

19:56

don't. They're not well suited for that. They can do a good job as single dad.

20:01

They can. But we have our different roles. And

20:06

this kind of thinking just ignores that. And in doing so

20:14

ignores how how just plain evil we can be. And

20:21

him saying decades, it's only been decades and it has full steam now. It's had full steam for a very long

20:29

time. It's just that compared to modernity doesn't seem like it did, I

20:34

don't know, back in the 40s. But if you were back in the 40s and you were comparing it to, I don't know, 40 years

20:40

prior to 1900, you would definitely think it was full steam ahead. Same as in the 60s. Can you

20:48

imagine what you're thinking if you were around in the 40s and you see what's

20:54

going on with the free love and everything? You're definitely going to g going to think it's full steam ahead.

21:00

It's just this we just don't see our history the way we should

21:07

because he who controls the past controls the present and he who controls

21:13

the present controls the future. And the way we understand where

21:19

we are now and where our history is and what has happened is through school. And

21:26

who controls that? Who's who does that again? Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. That's that's

21:32

state and government. But that's because they care about you. No, no. They want you to be educated. Yeah. I've seen that

21:38

claim be made. And it's always amused me. You know, this notion that women,

21:43

you know, feminists who talk about men's mental health, they're just like really motivated by compassion for men. They

21:48

want the best for them. No, absolutely not. They're trying to strip men of their masculinity because that benefits

21:56

them. They feel like men will be less of a threat. They'll be easier to control, easier to manipulate. It sets up a very

22:03

good society for women. Or so they think. I think they happen to be wrong about that. But no, these women are not

22:09

motivated by like empathy for the male experience. They're just trying to turn them into women because that suits their

22:15

agenda. That's a strong assertion. But why assume feminist efforts to address men's mental health are driven by

22:22

manipulation rather than genuine concern? Isn't it possible that challenging toxic masculinity and

22:28

promoting emotional openness benefits both men and women by creating healthier relationships and reducing violence? Or

22:36

do the relationships look healthier? That's the gaslighting. Do

22:41

the relationships look healthier today than they did, I don't know, 50 years ago? No. No. This is gaslighting by

22:50

whoever is programming this AI. Do you think any

22:55

challenge to traditional masculinity is inherently harmful? Well, I don't agree that what they're doing is targeting

23:02

toxic masculinity. What I see is an effort to paint masculinity itself as

23:08

toxic. Because if they were genuinely a movement that was criticizing toxicity,

23:13

as it appears in all its forms, toxic masculinity and toxic femininity, then

23:18

that's a movement that I could get on board with because I acknowledge individuals of either gender can be

23:23

toxic. But that's not what we see from feminism. You know, the female side is conveniently ignored. We don't talk

23:30

about the ways that women can abuse men and how No, we're sugar and spice and

23:36

all things nice. We don't do that. That relates to the gender. It's always the

23:41

same narrative of the awful man who is taking advantage of the poor victim woman. And that is a very convenient

23:49

narrative to say, "Hey, like we're just after toxic masculinity." But no, it's

23:54

completely gendered one-sided. Like you always see the women's story taking precedence. That's suspicious. I hear

24:01

you. It's true that mainstream feminist messaging focuses heavily on male

24:06

perpetrated harm, but that's partly because the public narrative has long marginalized women's

24:13

experiences. Bologoney. Bologoney. She'll say something and then justify it. She

24:21

sounds like she's being somewhat agreeable and understanding your side,

24:26

and that can trick some people, believe it or not. But it's just still more gaslighting.

24:35

Feminists argue they're correcting that imbalance. Do you think the push back on toxic masculinity comes not from

24:41

painting all masculinity as toxic, but from trying to redefine it in healthier

24:46

ways? Okay, that part makes me really mad. Redefine it in healthier

24:54

ways. Right there, that's an admittance that we don't like masculinity.

25:01

We think it should be more feminine. We think your masculinity is just all wrong

25:06

and it's not it's not good. Man bad. This is where we get man bad. When you

25:13

start attacking masculinity and calling it toxic and

25:18

really, you know, sneaky ways and saying we're going to, you know, make it better. This is man bad.

25:26

I've never heard anything about femininity needing to be made better. I've never heard of that. Weird.

25:35

For example, encouraging empathy and emotional expression, or do you believe any attempt to redefine masculinity

25:41

inherently devalues it? So, you have a very rosy picture of the motivations of

25:48

this feminist movement. Like, oh, women's suffering inside relationships was marginalized for so long. That's why

25:55

there's such, you know, a glut of that story and not talking about men's. I don't know what culture you've been

26:02

looking at, but it feels like for the past five or six decades, that's the only story that's ever been spoken

26:08

about. If we want to talk about a narrative that has never been shared and spoken about, it's clearly the men's

26:14

narrative. Like, how much mainstream discourse is there about how women abuse

26:19

men inside relationships? That's actually the unspoken story. I'll tell

26:24

you what, it's a good way to get your YouTube video hidden, demonetized, all the rest of it. If you talk about that

26:32

stuff, that's a no-go. They silence it. They downplay

26:37

it. They hide it from You don't see it anywhere mainstream. You certainly don't see stories about it. You don't see

26:44

movies about it. There's tons of movies with women with, you know, abusive husbands, Sleeping with the Enemy, with

26:51

Julia Roberts, Enough with Jennifer Lopez. Um, I think there was one with

26:57

Ashley J. Just so many in every single episode of SVU practically. Where is it the other way

27:03

around? It's not. So to look at the past few decades of mainstream discourse and

27:10

to conclude that women's story has gone unspoken and that's why they need to dominate the narrative now just seems

27:17

like bizarro world to me. Like I cannot relate to where you're coming from at all in that. You're absolutely right

27:22

that the male victim narrative is less visible in mainstream discourse. But I'd

27:27

argue that's more due to broader cultural discomfort with seeing men as vulnerable rather than feminism's

27:34

intent. Yes. No. She just

27:40

said she she's just contradicting herself every which way. These people will just move

27:48

goalposts and shift and turn and gaslight you so you don't so you

27:54

question your reality. And that's

28:00

what we women are being programmed to do, too. Sometimes I look at these

28:06

younger women and I just think, goodness, forgive them for they know not what they do. And then I see how they

28:12

hurt you guys and I think, "Oh, I don't know. That's a hard that's a hard ask." The dominant narrative has focused on

28:18

male violence against women. But that's because it's such a widespread issue. The relative silence around female

28:25

perpetrated violence may reflect societal reluctance to portray women as aggressors. Would you agree that this

28:32

reluctance is rooted in long-standing gender stereotypes?

28:37

Societal reluctance. Who whose reluctance?

28:44

Because we're begging for it. Okay. Societal's reluctance. How about

28:53

the overlord's reluctance to show that at all? To show

28:59

that it's a problem. You know why? Because if they showed that that was such a problem, which it is, it would

29:06

destroy the arguments of the feminists. It really would. And it would Yeah, it

29:12

would destroy it. And then what are they going to say? Cultural bias, this that, and the other, systemic oppression,

29:19

widespread abuse, blah, blah, blah. And man, they go on and on about that a lot in Australia. Tell me some of you. I

29:25

know Robcat, you're from Australia. We got some other Aussies in the chat. It's bad there, right? They're

29:31

constantly telling you how bad it is in England, too. They're telling you how bad it is really when you know actually

29:38

who's doing it. There are some newcomers who are doing more of that. Not so much the men who've always

29:45

been there, right? So, it's infuriating rather than in

29:52

feminist advocacy. All right, let's see if we can meet each other halfway here because I will grant you that men have

29:59

actually pushed for their own benefit. Sometimes this men are strong, men are tough, you know, we don't have feelings

30:06

narrative for their own benefit because they how all due respect and I I would love

30:14

to get this answer, but how have they done that for their own benefit? Because

30:19

what I would say is that I think men especially in the 20th century well and

30:26

even you know in this century but as far as the draft goes with World War II. I'm

30:32

not sure if there was a draft for World War I. Probably definitely for Vietnam. We know there was men have been there's

30:39

definitely propaganda for it anyways. Even if they weren't forced to go, they were propagandized to go. We know that.

30:46

We didn't want to get involved in World War I, you know, and obviously they had to do the draft for World War II. So,

30:52

everyone was like, I don't want to do this again. Anyways, they were shipped off to do

30:59

this stuff. What are they going to do? And you're saying it was to their advantage to be

31:06

strong and tough. Oh yeah, that was your advantage. Come home in a

31:13

box. What do you mean it's your advantage? See? Oh, you benefited cuz you know your great-grandfather,

31:20

whoever, he benefited because he had to go down and build help build the Panama

31:25

Canal. You know, the coal miners benefited from being strong and stoic.

31:32

Clearly the thing that benefits you here in the west and has for over hundred

31:37

years is being a victim. When you paint yourself as a victim and you can convince other

31:44

people, suddenly you're going to get privilege. So when has and you guys

31:51

answer me in the chat because maybe I'm missing something. Please tell me if I'm missing something. You guys are really

31:57

smart. So, when has being strong and

32:02

stoic benefited a man? Because it seems to me that all it does is make it so

32:10

that you have to work and you're like work super hard at very tough things and

32:16

you're not allowed to cry. You're not allowed to Sorry, I'm screaming at

32:22

you. You're not allowed to be vulnerable. You're not allowed You know what I mean? So where are the

32:30

benefit where wanted to appear like strong and

32:36

invulnerable and that women have also pushed this I'm helpless you know I'm

32:42

just a victim narrative because it's also benefited them to have people view them that way and that these are

32:48

longstanding gender stereotypes that have existed before modern social and political movements.

32:55

However, we are physically weaker. So, there is more and we are

33:03

more emotional. And I would say that's our nature. And I don't think that it has to be a bad thing. I think that it

33:08

can be a very good thing when it's in the rightful place and used in the rightful ways. But

33:17

we we are physically weaker. There are more things that we will actually be

33:24

vulnerable about and be and need. Everybody knows that if this if

33:30

modernity and everything wasn't here and we were just, you know, suddenly modernity was gone, infrastructure, all

33:37

that, a man can survive on his own. Still be difficult, right, out in

33:42

the wild, but he can't. We cannot. And even still, like if I had a camper, I'm going to go. It's

33:50

way harder for us. It's just the truth. It's just the truth about who we each

33:56

are. Like, I will grant you that. But in return, I want you to admit that

34:02

feminism's, you know, hands are not clean. Like, there's blood there. Like, this movement has 100% exacerbated and

34:09

made this problem worse. I can acknowledge that mainstream feminism has at times reinforced certain narratives

34:16

like emphasizing male aggression and female victimhood which may have contributed to silencing male victims.

34:23

Feminism hasn't always been perfectly inclusive or balanced. However, I'd argue its primary goal has been to

34:30

address systemic gender inequalities. Could we say that while feminism has made missteps, it's still a crucial

34:36

force for challenging these harmful norms? or do you feel its missteps have fundamentally disqualified it as a

34:43

positive movement? Yeah, I'm ready for feminism to die. Like, I don't think the world needs it anymore. If you look at

34:50

whatever the stated goals of feminism were in terms of we want women to be

34:55

able to own property, we want them to be able to vote. We want them to be able to break free of cultural stereotypes and

35:02

follow whatever, you know, individual path they want to take. They they won. It's all been achieved. And I personally

35:09

think that's a good thing. I sell

35:15

no comment. Oh Mr. Grace,

35:23

no sir. Celebrate that. But at this stage the movement has outlived its

35:28

original purpose. Women have achieved the structural and systemic equality that they wanted to achieve. So what's

35:36

happened now is it has morphed into a reactionary hate group that continues to

35:42

push for female supremacy. And I fundamentally disagree with your characterization of the movement as

35:47

being about gender equality. It's obviously not because they spend no time talking about men's issues and the way

35:53

that men are discriminated against. It's all women women. So I I I completely

35:59

don't buy into your framing that this is about equality. Let's just call a spade a spade. Feminism is a female advocacy

36:06

movement that wants women to succeed. That is its goal. You've made right and

36:11

at the expense of who now? Oh yeah, you guys made your position clear.

36:19

I won't deny that modern feminism has at times leaned toward prioritizing women's

36:24

experiences and rights, often at the expense of broader equality narratives. However, I'd argue that the persistence

36:32

of wage gaps, under reppresentation of women in leadership, and ongoing cultural biases, we're right back to

36:39

where we started. It just did a whole complete loop.

36:45

That's exactly where she started. It's like just rewind the tape and start

36:51

again. Ongoing cultural biases, blah blah blah. Show there's still unfinished work. Could it be that while you see

36:58

feminism as an outdated women first movement, it's still addressing systemic

37:03

issues that genuinely affect women today? Or are you convinced those issues

37:08

no longer justify the existence of the movement at all? Yeah, those issues are basically non-issues. They're not really

37:16

significant enough to justify the smothering of the entire culture in this

37:22

feminist narrative. And you need to weigh whatever good they would be doing in advocacy in those narrow specific

37:29

areas with a huge amount of harm that feminism is doing in brainwashing young

37:34

women coming up into thinking that they're victims and that men are the enemy. And of course all of the damage

37:40

done to men who have to stomach everyday accusations that their masculinity is

37:46

toxic, that we live in a patriarchy, that they are privileged, and that nobody wants to hear their pain. I

37:51

understand your frustration, but I would argue that the current cultural narrative doesn't smother everything

37:57

with feminist ideology. Uhhuh. Doesn't smother everyone with

38:04

that ideology. Okay. More gaslighting. That's

38:09

where we're at. So, I will put the link to the full

38:16

show, the full 45 minute show of his in the description. Please go and watch the

38:22

whole thing. He does really good work. He's right about most of the things. I just think he doesn't go far enough and

38:30

he doesn't really know the history of that movement and what its intention

38:35

always was. They said some nice things and society and media and overlord put

38:42

that stuff front and center. Oh, equality blah blah blah. But it's always been basically a Marxist movement.

38:49

Victim oppressor. It's always been a Marxist movement. And we know where that goes. We've seen the experiment of it in

38:58

Russia and China and Cuba. We've seen it. Vietnam, different places around the world. We've seen what happens.

39:05

And the whole victim oppressor routine is used because who is this victim,

39:12

right? In any of the victim oppressor situations, who's helping this victim?

39:18

We did not, you know, mount up the troops and take our right to vote and do

39:24

those things. We didn't do that. So, who did that? Who was the force

39:29

behind it? We don't have the force to do that. So, who was the force behind it? Well, it was men

39:37

who not you guys, not men like you. It was other

39:43

people. Kibono, who benefits? Well, how has government changed not

39:51

just the United States but all across the West and in some cases kind of all across the world and how it's, you know,

39:57

consolidated a bit and immigration has been very

40:03

fluid and things have moved more to the left increasingly increasingly

40:09

increasingly regardless if you say, "Oh, we're just have to vote in the conservatives. we just have to vote in

40:14

the Republicans and whatever your country calls that the right side of um

40:20

the political spectrum. Oh, we just have to vote better people in but we always move to the

40:25

left and there's a huge voting voting block that facilitates that

40:35

weird. So at the end of the day kibono who's behind it and that tells you the

40:40

intention and how diabolical it's been from the beginning and we get

40:46

programmed and even the the young boys now especially in these latter generations the youngest one gen alpha

40:53

then Gen Z and a lot of millennials you saw that guy out there with that costume on a lot of them are getting programmed

40:58

too to believe this victim oppressor you know narrative of what history has been

41:04

and it's just a lie. lie. It's just a lie. So, I think it's important to, you

41:12

know, say what's true and get to the bottom of of things so you really know

41:18

what the nature of it is. Basically, call out evil. The truth at the end of the day,

41:26

no matter how long that day is, the truth wins.

41:32

and uh

41:38

well, you know, he's king and the truth will end up in the

41:45

end winning. But we need to know it's it's truly an evil that we're fighting.

41:52

More and more people, I'll just finish on this. More and more people, especially the men, are finding God. Joe

42:00

Rogan has started attending church and on one of his ra recent shows he said

42:05

I'm sticking with Jesus. You know why? I I can't speak for

42:11

him but the presence of evil in our world in the west is

42:18

palpable and it has shown people especially men because they're better at

42:24

detecting it. It has shown them that it is truly real. And so

42:30

logically, if that's truly real and it's supernatural by

42:36

nature, there's a there's a balance of that and there's good out there and that's real, too. We're more than just

42:43

matter. So, I just think you need to know what's really out there and that

42:49

will help protect you from those who would do you harm, accuse

42:56

you, take your children, break your heart, you know,

43:02

which doesn't sound like that big of a deal hear that, but I see a lot of men with broken hearts because of, you

43:09

know, women who don't realize they have one and at

43:14

the end of the day don't seem to care. So now that I've said all that, I'm just

43:21

also going to say protect your peace, which seems impossible, but you can. You totally can if you make a point to do it

43:28

and realize that you're worth it. You feed your souls. I love you guys and

43:33

I'll see you on the next one. Bye.

 

George Hunt: Maurice Strong and Baca Ranch Land Grab

George Hunt - The New World Bank, Religion, and Rulers FULL VERSION

The above details the results of meeting in 1992 of the UN Earth Summit making World government a certainty and inevitability by planning that world currencies are secured against zero valued land (wasteland, deserts, etc) and then caused to collapse putting a fake currency in its place with mortgages on all the world's assets. This effectively will place all the world's wealth in the currency of the World Conservation Bank, which will be (is already) owned by a few of the world's wealthiest capitalists. The meeting that was recorded and listened to in this video was a meeting of world criminals that include the wealthiest people on earth, planning an enormous criminal act like never before which will result in the the world being materially owned by a few people, and the world's population by then being subjugated completely and consigned to the whims and slavery of those criminals.

The above communicates patent ACT OF WAR.

Keywords: 666 environment evil Christianity world baca stan satanic testament osiris ausir ausis satan

 

Image

More on: Control

Source References

The background information to any of the main articles will appear here and will remain in context.

WAR

Superstate endeavours for supremacy in Europe?

Superstates, or superstatist leaders, have brought about war on the largest scale that human conflict has ever embraced. Whilst sovereign states generally do not wish for nor relish war, superstates and superstatists do, because of the need for domination that is created by their aspirations to expand.

It is in this context that Peter Hitchen's lecture, or talk, below is undoubtedly interesting and, most likely, most enlightening also.

Following another line of inquiry we have the admirable efforts of Peter of England

Peter of England